With The Presidential Election Looming, A Closer Look At The US Supreme Court
With election day just over a month away, Republicans are pushing to fill the vacancy on the US Supreme Court left by the death of Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.
Stetson University College of Law professor Louis Virelli joins Intersection to discuss the implications of a Supreme Court with just eight justices, the nomination process, and the notion of expanding the court.
If a new justice were not confirmed before the presidential election, would eight justices be enough to rule on a case involving the election?
“I think the short answer is, it would not, it would not be enough to meet people’s expectations,” said Virelli.
He said a case involving the election where the justices were to tie four- four “would mean that whatever the lower court decided, would be the rule of the case would be the law of the case.”
“That’s problematic, because it would effectively mean that a regional court would be resolving a national election, as opposed to the highest court in the land,” said Virelli.
“There are, of course, problems with a court deciding an election in any circumstances. But it becomes even more problematic when that court is not the highest court.”
Listen to the full conversation using the audio player at the top of the page.
Get The 90.7 WMFE Newsletter
Your trusted news source for the latest Central Florida COVID-19 news, updates on special programs and more. Support our extended coverage.GET THE LATEST